Celeron N3350
VS
E2-1800

Celeron N3350 vs E2-1800

Intel

Celeron N3350

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016
VS
AMD

E2-1800

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N3350 is positioned at rank 1068 and the E2-1800 is on rank 826, so the E2-1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3350

#1056
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2824%
#1057
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2782%
#1058
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2554%
#1059
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2543%
#1060
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2520%
#1062
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2433%
#1063
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2333%
#1064
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2329%
#1065
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2267%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E2-1800

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16849%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15921%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11560%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3483%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2759%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2413%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1382%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1364%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1242%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1242%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1228%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1195%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1178%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1173%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1163%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#826
E2-1800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
100%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
99%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
99%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
99%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
99%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
98%
#838
Pentium G645
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#840
Pentium G630
MSRP: $75|Avg: $46
98%
#841
Core i5-2550K
MSRP: $235|Avg: $46
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron N3350 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the E2-1800 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron N3350E2-1800
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N3350E2-1800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N3350 and E2-1800

Intel

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

AMD

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350. The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron N3350. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureCeleron N3350E2-1800
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+41%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm-65%
40 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,112
1,110
Geekbench 6 Single
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-1800 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N3350E2-1800
Socket
FCBGA1296
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) / not specified (E2-1800). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the E2-1800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeatureCeleron N3350E2-1800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop/NUC