Celeron N3350 vs Xeon W3503

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3350 vs Xeon W3503 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3350 vs Xeon W3503: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 130W, a 124W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Xeon W3503 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,112 vs 1,125).
❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Xeon W3503 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon W3503

2009

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌2066.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W3503 better than Celeron N3350?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W3503 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron N3350 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W3503 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W3503 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon W3503 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron N3350 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N3350 vs Xeon W3503 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Xeon W3503

The Xeon W3503 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,125 points. Launch price was $65.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and Xeon W3503 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon W3503 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W3503 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Xeon W3503's 1,125 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W3503. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N3350 vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3503.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Xeon W3503
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+118%
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,112	1,125+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3503 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Xeon W3503
Socket	FCBGA1296	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) / not specified (Xeon W3503). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Xeon W3503 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.