Athlon II Neo K325
VS
Celeron N3350

Athlon II Neo K325 vs Celeron N3350

AMD

Athlon II Neo K325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron N3350

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II Neo K325 is positioned at rank 912 and the Celeron N3350 is on rank 1068, so the Athlon II Neo K325 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K325

#900
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1584%
#901
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1561%
#902
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1433%
#903
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1427%
#904
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1413%
#906
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1365%
#907
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1309%
#908
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1307%
#909
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1272%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
100%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
99%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#923
Athlon II N370
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3350

#1056
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2824%
#1057
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2782%
#1058
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2554%
#1059
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2543%
#1060
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2520%
#1062
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2433%
#1063
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2333%
#1064
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2329%
#1065
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2267%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3350 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II Neo K325 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+328%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron N3350

AMD

Athlon II Neo K325

The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II Neo K325 and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350. The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K325 scores 1,111 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 736 vs 250, a 98.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,235 vs 450 (93.2% advantage for the Athlon II Neo K325).

FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.3 GHz
2.4 GHz+85%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Geneva (2010)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,111
1,112
Geekbench 6 Single
736+194%
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,235+174%
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Athlon II Neo K325 versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II Neo K325) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the Celeron N3350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: M880G (Athlon II Neo K325) and SoC (Celeron N3350).

FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
Socket
S1
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800
LPDDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Athlon II Neo K325 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power, Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power
Entry Level Laptop/NUC
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II Neo K325 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Celeron N3350 debuted at $107.

FeatureAthlon II Neo K325Celeron N3350
MSRP
$60-44%
$107
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Release Date
2010
2016