Athlon II M340
Athlon II Neo K325
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II Neo K325 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II Neo K325 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II Neo K325: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II M340
2009Why buy it
- ✅+16.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 18.5 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Athlon II Neo K325
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 32.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.5 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (736 vs 858).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,235 vs 1,500).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II M340 better than Athlon II Neo K325?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II Neo K325 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II M340
The Athlon II M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon II Neo K325
The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II M340 and Athlon II Neo K325 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II M340 versus 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 — a 51.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II M340. The Athlon II M340 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M340 scores 1,115 against the Athlon II Neo K325's 1,111 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II M340. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 858 vs 736, a 15.3% lead for the Athlon II M340 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,500 vs 1,235 (19.4% advantage for the Athlon II M340).
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+69% | 1.3 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Geneva (2010) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,111 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 858+17% | 736 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,500+21% | 1,235 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II M340 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: RS880M (Athlon II M340) and M880G (Athlon II Neo K325).
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Athlon II M340 targets Laptop, Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Laptop | Low Power |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II M340 was priced at $80, while the Athlon II Neo K325 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($80 vs $60), Athlon II Neo K325 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M340 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 18.5 pts/$ for the Athlon II Neo K325 — making the Athlon II Neo K325 the 28.2% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II Neo K325 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $60-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 18.5+33% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II M340 and Athlon II Neo K325
