Athlon II M340
VS
Celeron 1005M

Athlon II M340 vs Celeron 1005M

AMD

Athlon II M340

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron 1005M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II M340 is positioned at rank 1001 and the Celeron 1005M is on rank 1018, so the Athlon II M340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II M340

#989
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2105%
#990
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2074%
#991
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1904%
#992
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1895%
#993
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1878%
#995
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1813%
#996
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1739%
#997
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1736%
#998
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1689%
#1001
Athlon II M340
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
100%
#1005
Pentium P6000
MSRP: $150|Avg: $90
98%
#1007
Core i7-3630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1008
Core i7-3610QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1009
Core i3-1115GRE
MSRP: $338|Avg: $480
97%
#1010
Pentium A1020
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1011
Core i7-4702MQ
MSRP: $383|Avg: $50
97%
#1012
Pentium N4200
MSRP: $161|Avg: $30.89
96%
#1013
Pentium J2900
MSRP: $94|Avg: $20
96%
#1014
Celeron T1700
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
95%
#1015
Celeron T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
95%
#1016
A12-9720P
MSRP: $200|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1005M

#1006
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2260%
#1007
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2227%
#1008
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2045%
#1009
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2035%
#1010
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2017%
#1012
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1948%
#1013
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1867%
#1014
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1864%
#1015
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1814%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
98%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II M340 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1005M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II M340 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 83% cheaper ($15 vs $86) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+473%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II M340 and Celeron 1005M

AMD

Athlon II M340

The Athlon II M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II M340 and Celeron 1005M share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II M340 versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II M340. The Athlon II M340 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 1005M uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M340 scores 1,115 against the Celeron 1005M's 1,116 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 1005M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 858 vs 350, a 84.1% lead for the Athlon II M340 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,500 vs 607 (84.8% advantage for the Athlon II M340).

FeatureAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+16%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Caspian (2009)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,115
1,116
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
858+145%
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,500+147%
607
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II M340 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1005M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon II M340 versus DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1005M — the Celeron 1005M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1005M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II M340) vs 16 (Celeron 1005M) — the Celeron 1005M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M (Athlon II M340) and HM76,HM77 (Celeron 1005M).

FeatureAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
Socket
S1g3
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3-1600+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II M340) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Athlon II M340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II M340 targets Laptop.

FeatureAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Laptop
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II M340 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Celeron 1005M debuted at $86.

FeatureAthlon II M340Celeron 1005M
MSRP
$80-7%
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2009
2013