
Athlon II M340

Celeron G540T
Athlon II M340 vs Celeron G540T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II M340 vs Celeron G540T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II M340 vs Celeron G540T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II M340
2009Why buy it
- ✅+123.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G540T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron G540T
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $38 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Athlon II M340 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (384 vs 858).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (655 vs 1,500).
- ❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II M340 better than Celeron G540T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II M340 vs Celeron G540T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II M340
The Athlon II M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G540T
The Celeron G540T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,137 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II M340 and Celeron G540T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II M340 versus 2.1 GHz on the Celeron G540T — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II M340. The Athlon II M340 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G540T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M340 scores 1,115 against the Celeron G540T's 1,137 — a 2% lead for the Celeron G540T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 858 vs 384, a 76.3% lead for the Athlon II M340 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,500 vs 655 (78.4% advantage for the Athlon II M340).
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Celeron G540T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,137+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 858+123% | 384 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,500+129% | 655 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II M340 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G540T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon II M340 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G540T — the Celeron G540T supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G540T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II M340) vs 16 (Celeron G540T) — the Celeron G540T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M (Athlon II M340) and H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G540T).
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Celeron G540T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II M340) vs VT-x (Celeron G540T). The Celeron G540T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon II M340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II M340 targets Laptop, Celeron G540T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G540T rivals Pentium G630T.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Celeron G540T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Laptop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II M340 was priced at $80, while the Celeron G540T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($80 vs $42), Celeron G540T was $38 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M340 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G540T — making the Celeron G540T the 64.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Celeron G540T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $42-48% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 27.1+95% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















