
Athlon II M340

Athlon II X2 245
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II X2 245 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II X2 245 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II X2 245: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II M340
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,115 vs 1,134).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 17.2 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $66 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 245.
Athlon II X2 245
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($66 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($66 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon II M340.
Trade-offs
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 245 better than Athlon II M340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II M340 vs Athlon II X2 245 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II M340
The Athlon II M340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon II X2 245
The Athlon II X2 245 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,134 points. Launch price was $35.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II M340 and Athlon II X2 245 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon II M340 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X2 245 — a 27.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 245. The Athlon II M340 uses the Caspian (2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II M340 scores 1,115 against the Athlon II X2 245's 1,134 — a 1.7% lead for the Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+32% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Caspian (2009) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,115 | 1,134+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 858 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II M340 uses the S1g3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 245 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon II M340 versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 245 — the Athlon II X2 245 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 245 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: RS880M (Athlon II M340) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 245).
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | 1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II M340) vs true (Athlon II X2 245). Primary use case: Athlon II M340 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 245 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II M340 was priced at $80, while the Athlon II X2 245 came in at $66. On launch pricing ($80 vs $66), Athlon II X2 245 was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II M340 delivers 13.9 pts/$ vs 17.2 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 245 — making the Athlon II X2 245 the 20.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II M340 | Athlon II X2 245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $66-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.9 | 17.2+24% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















