Athlon II Neo K325 vs Core 2 Duo E8435
Athlon II Neo K325
Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II Neo K325 is positioned at rank 912 and the Core 2 Duo E8435 is on rank 1152, so the Athlon II Neo K325 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II Neo K325
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Geneva (2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+198%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($74) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II Neo K325 and Core 2 Duo E8435
Athlon II Neo K325
The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo E8435
The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II Neo K325 and Core 2 Duo E8435 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — a 179.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II Neo K325. The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K325 scores 1,111 against the Core 2 Duo E8435's 1,104 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 736 vs 257, a 96.5% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.3 GHz+1757% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 3.067 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Geneva (2010) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,111 | 1,104 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 736+186% | 257 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,235 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: M880G (Athlon II Neo K325) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435).
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435). Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II Neo K325 launched at $60 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8435 debuted at $150. At current prices ($25 vs $74), the Athlon II Neo K325 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II Neo K325 delivers 44.4 pts/$ vs 14.9 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8435 — making the Athlon II Neo K325 the 99.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II Neo K325 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-60% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-66% | $74 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+198% | 14.9 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II Neo K325 and Core 2 Duo E8435
