Athlon II Neo K325 vs E2-1800

AMD

Athlon II Neo K325

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

E2-1800

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II Neo K325 vs E2-1800 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II Neo K325 vs E2-1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II Neo K325 vs E2-1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II Neo K325

2010

Why buy it

  • +0.1% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while E2-1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,110 vs 1,111).
    • 1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon II Neo K325 better than E2-1800?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, E2-1800 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K325 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II Neo K325 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon II Neo K325 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that E2-1800 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E2-1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Athlon II Neo K325 vs E2-1800 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon II Neo K325

    The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    E2-1800

    The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon II Neo K325 and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the E2-1800. The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the Geneva (2010) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II Neo K325 scores 1,111 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325E2-1800
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.3 GHz
    1.7 GHz+31%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    512K (per core)+51100%
    Process
    45 nm
    40 nm-11%
    Architecture
    Geneva (2010)
    Zacate (2011−2013)
    PassMark
    1,111
    1,110
    Geekbench 6 Single
    736
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,235
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon II Neo K325 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-1800 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325E2-1800
    Socket
    S1
    FT1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-800
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II Neo K325) / not specified (E2-1800). Primary use case: Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power.

    FeatureAthlon II Neo K325E2-1800
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Low Power