PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1005M vs Celeron N3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1005M vs Celeron N3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1005M

2013

Why buy it

✅+40% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 350).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 607).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1005M better than Celeron N3350?

Yes. Celeron 1005M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 34.9% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.4% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1005M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1005M is the stronger fit. You are getting 34.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1005M is the better buy right now. Celeron 1005M comes in $21 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.9% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1005M vs Celeron N3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1005M and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 1005M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 250, a 33.3% lead for the Celeron 1005M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 607 vs 450 (29.7% advantage for the Celeron 1005M). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 0 kB on the Celeron N3350.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Celeron N3350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz+73%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	1 MB+100%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark	1,116	1,112
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	350+40%	250
Geekbench 6 Multi	607+35%	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1005M versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1005M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1005M) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the Celeron 1005M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,HM77 (Celeron 1005M) and SoC (Celeron N3350).

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Celeron N3350
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	LPDDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+167%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1005M) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Celeron N3350
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Entry Level Laptop/NUC

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1005M was priced at $86, while the Celeron N3350 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($86 vs $107), Celeron 1005M was $21 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1005M delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 10.4 pts/$ for the Celeron N3350 — making the Celeron 1005M the 22.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	Celeron N3350
MSRP	$86-20%	$107
Performance per Dollar	13.0+25%	10.4
Release Date	2013	2016

Search Celeron 1005M on Amazon

Search Celeron N3350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.