Celeron 1005M vs E2-3800

Celeron 1005M vs E2-3800 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1005M

2 / 2

1,116

0.0%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,136

+1.8%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-3800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-3800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1005M

2013

Why buy it

✅+157.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 14.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 11.4 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

E2-3800

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (136 vs 350).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (389 vs 607).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1005M better than E2-3800?

Yes. Celeron 1005M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 56% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1005M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1005M is the stronger fit. You are getting 56% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1005M is the better buy right now. Celeron 1005M comes in $14 cheaper on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 14.2% better value on MSRP (13.0 vs 11.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-3800 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron 1005M vs E2-3800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

E2-3800

The E2-3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,136 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1005M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the E2-3800 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the E2-3800 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 1.3 GHz on the E2-3800 — a 37.5% clock advantage for the Celeron 1005M. The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the E2-3800 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the E2-3800's 1,136 — a 1.8% lead for the E2-3800. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 136, a 88.1% lead for the Celeron 1005M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 607 vs 389 (43.8% advantage for the Celeron 1005M).

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-3800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+46%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,116	1,136+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	656	—
Geekbench 6 Single	350+157%	136
Geekbench 6 Multi	607+56%	389

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the E2-3800 uses FT3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 1005M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron 1005M) vs 1 (E2-3800). PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1005M) vs 4 (E2-3800) — the Celeron 1005M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM76,HM77 (Celeron 1005M) and SoC (E2-3800).

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-3800
Socket	PGA988	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) vs Yes (E2-3800). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1005M) and Radeon HD 8280 (E2-3800) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-3800
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	Radeon HD 8280
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1005M was priced at $86, while the E2-3800 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($86 vs $100), Celeron 1005M was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1005M delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the E2-3800 — making the Celeron 1005M the 13.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1005M	E2-3800
MSRP	$86-14%	$100
Performance per Dollar	13.0+14%	11.4
Release Date	2013	2013

Search Celeron 1005M on Amazon

Search E2-3800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.