Celeron 1005M
VS
Xeon W3503

Celeron 1005M vs Xeon W3503

Intel

Celeron 1005M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Xeon W3503

2 Cores2 Thrd130 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1005M is positioned at rank 1018 and the Xeon W3503 is on rank 978, so the Xeon W3503 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1005M

#1006
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2260%
#1007
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2227%
#1008
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2045%
#1009
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2035%
#1010
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2017%
#1012
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1948%
#1013
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1867%
#1014
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1864%
#1015
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1814%
#1018
Celeron 1005M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
100%
#1019
Athlon 64 X2 TK-42
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#1020
Athlon Neo MV-40
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
98%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
96%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
95%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
94%
#1032
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3503

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
36913%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6970%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6192%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4784%
#978
Xeon W3503
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
98%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
97%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
97%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
94%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
94%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
93%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
93%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
92%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
92%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
91%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
87%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
85%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
84%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3503 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCeleron 1005MXeon W3503
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bloomfield (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 1005M ($86), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($86 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCeleron 1005MXeon W3503
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($86)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1005M and Xeon W3503

Intel

Celeron 1005M

The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Xeon W3503

The Xeon W3503 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Bloomfield (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,125 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1005M and Xeon W3503 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon W3503 — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W3503 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3503 uses Bloomfield (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the Xeon W3503's 1,125 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon W3503. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon W3503.

FeatureCeleron 1005MXeon W3503
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz+26%
L3 Cache
2 MB
4 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Bloomfield (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,116
1,125
Cinebench R23 Multi
656
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
607
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3503 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1005MXeon W3503
Socket
PGA988
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (Xeon W3503). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Xeon W3503 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron 1005MXeon W3503
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d