
Celeron 1005M

Pentium G640T
Celeron 1005M vs Pentium G640T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 1005M vs Pentium G640T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 1005M vs Pentium G640T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 1005M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium G640T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,116 vs 1,139).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.0 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
Pentium G640T
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $22 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.8 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1005M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G640T better than Celeron 1005M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 1005M vs Pentium G640T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1005M
The Celeron 1005M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,116 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium G640T
The Pentium G640T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,139 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 1005M and Pentium G640T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 1005M versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium G640T — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G640T (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Celeron 1005M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G640T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1005M scores 1,116 against the Pentium G640T's 1,139 — a 2% lead for the Pentium G640T. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 1005M vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G640T.
| Feature | Celeron 1005M | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,116 | 1,139+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 656 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 607 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 1005M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G640T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 1005M | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 1005M) / not specified (Pentium G640T). The Celeron 1005M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium G640T requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Celeron 1005M | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 1005M was priced at $86, while the Pentium G640T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($86 vs $64), Pentium G640T was $22 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1005M delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Pentium G640T — making the Pentium G640T the 31.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 1005M | Pentium G640T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86 | $64-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0 | 17.8+37% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














