CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo E7200
Celeron T3300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7200 is positioned at rank 1040 and the Celeron T3300 is on rank 1038, so the Celeron T3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Per Dollar Celeron T3300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+789%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron T3300
Core 2 Duo E7200
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.
Celeron T3300
The Celeron T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is built on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7200 scores 1,002 against the Celeron T3300's 1,005 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron T3300. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200 vs 1 MB on the Celeron T3300.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.53 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.53 GHz+26% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | — |
| PassMark | 1,002 | 1,005 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 368 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 666 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E7200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T3300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200) / not specified (Celeron T3300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E7200 launched at $133 MSRP, while the Celeron T3300 debuted at $86. At current prices ($133 vs $15), the Celeron T3300 is $118 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E7200 delivers 7.5 pts/$ vs 67.0 pts/$ for the Celeron T3300 — making the Celeron T3300 the 159.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E7200 | Celeron T3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $133 | $86-35% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $133 | $15-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.5 | 67.0+793% |
| Release Date | 2008 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E7200 and Celeron T3300
