Core 2 Duo E7200 vs E1-6010

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs E1-6010 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 / 2

1,002

0.0%

1,006

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs E1-6010 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs E1-6010: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E7200

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike E1-6010.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,002 vs 1,006).
❌Launch MSRP is still $133 MSRP, while E1-6010 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.

E1-6010

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E7200.

Quick Answers

So, is E1-6010 better than Core 2 Duo E7200?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E7200 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, E1-6010 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E1-6010 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E1-6010 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E1-6010 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $133 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E7200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2008 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E1-6010 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E7200 vs E1-6010 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E7200

The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.

E1-6010

The E1-6010 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.35 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,006 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E7200 and E1-6010 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 versus 1.35 GHz on the E1-6010 — a 60.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200. The Core 2 Duo E7200 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the E1-6010 uses Beema (2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7200 scores 1,002 against the E1-6010's 1,006 — a 0.4% lead for the E1-6010.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7200	E1-6010
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.53 GHz+87%	1.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	3 MB (total)+200%	1024 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Beema (2014)
PassMark	1,002	1,006
Geekbench 6 Single	368	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	666	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-6010 uses FT3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7200	E1-6010
Socket	LGA775	FT3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200) / not specified (E1-6010). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.