Core 2 Duo E7200 vs Core 2 Duo T9400

CPU

GPU

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Core 2 Duo T9400

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core 2 Duo E7200

2 / 2

1,002

0.0%

1,004

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E7200 is positioned at rank 1040 and the Core 2 Duo T9400 is on rank 796, so the Core 2 Duo T9400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

41396%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

39116%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

28401%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

8556%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

6777%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

5929%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

3396%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

3351%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3052%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3051%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3017%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

2936%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

2895%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

2883%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

2857%

#1039

Athlon II X4 638

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

100%

#1040

Core 2 Duo E7200

MSRP: $133|Avg: $133

100%

#1042

Phenom X3 8750

MSRP: $195|Avg: $20

98%

#1043

Pentium G4400TE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

97%

#1044

Celeron 2.60

MSRP: $53|Avg: $10

96%

#1045

Core i7-990X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $225

95%

#1046

Phenom X4 9750B

MSRP: $215|Avg: $34

94%

#1047

Core 2 Duo E8200

MSRP: $163|Avg: $20

93%

#1048

Core 2 Quad Q9450

MSRP: $316|Avg: $15

93%

#1049

Core 2 Duo E8600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $95

92%

#1050

Core 2 Duo E6320

MSRP: $163|Avg: $5

91%

#1051

Core i7-980X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

91%

#1052

Athlon 64 X2 3600+

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

90%

#1053

Core 2 Duo E6420

MSRP: $183|Avg: $10

90%

#1054

Phenom X4 9600B

MSRP: $278|Avg: $20

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9400

#784

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1198%

#785

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1180%

#786

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1084%

#787

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1079%

#788

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1069%

#790

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1032%

#791

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

990%

#792

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

988%

#793

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

962%

#796

Core 2 Duo T9400

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#797

Celeron M 900

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

100%

#799

Celeron B815

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

99%

#801

Celeron B810

MSRP: $86|Avg: $86

99%

#803

Core i7-1365UE

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

99%

#805

3020e

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

98%

#809

Athlon II M320

MSRP: $75|Avg: $15

98%

#810

Celeron B800

MSRP: $80|Avg: $5

98%

#811

Celeron B710

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E7200 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T9400 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core 2 Duo E7200	Core 2 Duo T9400
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Core 2 Duo E7200	Core 2 Duo T9400
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($133)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core 2 Duo E7200 Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo T9400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Duo T9400

Core 2 Duo E7200

The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Duo T9400

The Core 2 Duo T9400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 July 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $316.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E7200 and Core 2 Duo T9400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9400 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.53 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E7200 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9400 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E7200 scores 1,002 against the Core 2 Duo T9400's 1,004 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9400. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 368 vs 320, a 14% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7200 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9400.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7200	Core 2 Duo T9400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.53 GHz	2.53 GHz
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	3 MB (total)	6 MB+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,002	1,004
Geekbench 6 Single	368+15%	320
Geekbench 6 Multi	666	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E7200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo T9400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo T9400 — the Core 2 Duo T9400 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200) and GM45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo T9400).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E7200	Core 2 Duo T9400
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop, Core 2 Duo T9400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245; Core 2 Duo T9400 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.