Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is positioned at rank 1038 and the Core 2 Duo E7200 is on rank 1040, so the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+345%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($30) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Core 2 Duo E7200
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.
Core 2 Duo E7200
The Core 2 Duo E7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,002 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Core 2 Duo E7200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus 2.53 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200. The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo E7200's 1,002 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 368, a 20.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7200 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 520 vs 666 (24.6% advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7200).
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.53 GHz+26% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.53 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 3 MB (total)+200% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,005 | 1,002 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | 368+23% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 520 | 666+28% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E7200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7200 — the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E7200) — the Core 2 Duo E7200 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7200).
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7200 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7200). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo E7200 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200; Core 2 Duo E7200 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | No | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E7200 debuted at $133. At current prices ($30 vs $133), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is $103 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 delivers 33.5 pts/$ vs 7.5 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E7200 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 the 126.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron Dual-Core T3300 | Core 2 Duo E7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $86-35% | $133 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-77% | $133 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.5+347% | 7.5 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Core 2 Duo E7200
