Athlon II X2 240e vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300

Athlon II X2 240e vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X2 240e

2 / 2

1,007

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2 / 2

1,005

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 240e

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($77 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 11.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($77 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron Dual-Core T3300.

Trade-offs

❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,005 vs 1,007).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $77 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 240e.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 240e better than Celeron Dual-Core T3300?

Yes. Athlon II X2 240e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 240e has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 40% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 240e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 240e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 240e comes in $9 cheaper on MSRP at $77 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% higher PassMark. It is also 11.9% better value on MSRP (13.1 vs 11.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 240e vs Celeron Dual-Core T3300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 240e

The Athlon II X2 240e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $35.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 240e and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 240e versus 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 240e. The Athlon II X2 240e uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 240e scores 1,007 against the Celeron Dual-Core T3300's 1,005 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X2 240e.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+40%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Regor (2009−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,007	1,005
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	520

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 240e uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Athlon II X2 240e versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 — the Athlon II X2 240e supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 240e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 240e) and GL40,GM45,GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300).

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Socket	AM3	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	1333+67%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 240e) vs No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 240e rivals Pentium E5400; Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Celeron Dual-Core T3300
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	No
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 240e was priced at $77, while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($77 vs $86), Athlon II X2 240e was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 240e delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 11.7 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 — making the Athlon II X2 240e the 11.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X2 240e	Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP	$77-10%	$86
Performance per Dollar	13.1+12%	11.7
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Athlon II X2 240e on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.