Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Celeron J3060

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Celeron J3060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Celeron J3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 1W instead of 6W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while Celeron J3060 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J3060 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron J3060

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 400, while Celeron Dual-Core T3300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 300).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (370 vs 520).
❌500% higher power demand at 6W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core T3300 better than Celeron J3060?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 40.5% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 40.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core T3300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $86 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J3060 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Celeron J3060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J3060

The Celeron J3060 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 January 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Airmont (2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.48 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Celeron J3060 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus 2.48 GHz on the Celeron J3060 — a 21.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J3060. The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron J3060 uses Airmont (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 scores 1,005 against the Celeron J3060's 1,015 — a 1% lead for the Celeron J3060. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 200, a 40% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 520 vs 370 (33.7% advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core T3300).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Celeron J3060
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.48 GHz+24%
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	14 nm-69%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Airmont (2016)
PassMark	1,005	1,015
Geekbench 6 Single	300+50%	200
Geekbench 6 Multi	520+41%	370

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron J3060 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron J3060 — the Celeron J3060 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs 4 (Celeron J3060) — the Celeron J3060 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) and SoC (Celeron J3060).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Celeron J3060
Socket	P	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	DDR3L-1600+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs VT-x, EPT (Celeron J3060). The Celeron J3060 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 400), while the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget, Celeron J3060 targets Low Power Desktop/NAS. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200; Celeron J3060 rivals Pentium J3710.