Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo E4700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo E4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo E4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Delivers 53.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.7 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $133 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,005 vs 1,011).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E4700.

Core 2 Duo E4700

2008

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron Dual-Core T3300.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($133 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E4700 better than Celeron Dual-Core T3300?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E4700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E4700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E4700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E4700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core 2 Duo E4700 comes in 54.7% more expensive on MSRP at $133 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron Dual-Core T3300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 53.7% better value on paper (11.7 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Core 2 Duo E4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E4700

The Core 2 Duo E4700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,011 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Core 2 Duo E4700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4700 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E4700. The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 scores 1,005 against the Core 2 Duo E4700's 1,011 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo E4700.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Core 2 Duo E4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock	—	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark	1,005	1,011
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	520	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core 2 Duo E4700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E4700 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E4700) — the Core 2 Duo E4700 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45,GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4700).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Core 2 Duo E4700
Socket	P	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4700). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200; Core 2 Duo E4700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Core 2 Duo E4700
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	false
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 was priced at $86, while the Core 2 Duo E4700 came in at $133. On launch pricing ($86 vs $133), Celeron Dual-Core T3300 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 delivers 11.7 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E4700 — making the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 the 42.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP	$86-35%	$133
Performance per Dollar	11.7+54%	7.6
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E4700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.