Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E5400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E5400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E5400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,005 vs 1,007).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.7 vs 18.3 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $55 MSRP).

Pentium E5400

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($55 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 56.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 11.7 PassMark/$ ($55 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5400 better than Celeron Dual-Core T3300?

Yes. Pentium E5400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5400 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5400 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5400 comes in $31 cheaper on MSRP at $55 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 56.7% better value on MSRP (18.3 vs 11.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Pentium E5400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core T3300

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5400

The Pentium E5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,007 points. Launch price was $55.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 and Pentium E5400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium E5400 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Pentium E5400. The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E5400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 scores 1,005 against the Pentium E5400's 1,007 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium E5400.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E5400
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,005	1,007
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	520	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E5400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E5400
Socket	P	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: No (Celeron Dual-Core T3300) / not specified (Pentium E5400). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core T3300 rivals Pentium T4200.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E5400
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	No	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 was priced at $86, while the Pentium E5400 came in at $55. On launch pricing ($86 vs $55), Pentium E5400 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core T3300 delivers 11.7 pts/$ vs 18.3 pts/$ for the Pentium E5400 — making the Pentium E5400 the 44.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core T3300	Pentium E5400
MSRP	$86	$55-36%
Performance per Dollar	11.7	18.3+56%
Release Date	2010	2009

Search Celeron Dual-Core T3300 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.