Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i3-330M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i3-330M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i3-330M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E8135

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 44W instead of 512W, a 468W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,020 vs 1,032).
❌Launch MSRP is still $200 MSRP, while Core i3-330M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-330M

2010

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale), while Core 2 Duo E8135 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1063.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 44W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E8135 better than Core i3-330M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E8135 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E8135 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E8135 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $200 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-330M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i3-330M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8135

The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E8135 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 versus 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M — a 135% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8135 (base: 2.667 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-330M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8135 scores 1,020 against the Core i3-330M's 1,032 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i3-330M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8135	Core i3-330M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	0.67 GHz+415%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.667 GHz+25%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+2300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,020	1,032+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	317
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-330M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8135	Core i3-330M
Socket	P	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	—	8 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135) / VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M). The Core i3-330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.