
Core 2 Duo E8135

Core i5-560UM
Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i5-560UM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i5-560UM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i5-560UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E8135
2009Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $50 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- β Delivers 25.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 4.1 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β144.4% higher power demand at 44W vs 18W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i5-560UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-560UM
2010Why buy it
- β Draws 18W instead of 44W, a 26W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Core 2 Duo E8135 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,015 vs 1,020).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8135 better than Core i5-560UM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Core i5-560UM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8135
The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i5-560UM
The Core i5-560UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,015 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E8135 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-560UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 versus 2.13 GHz on the Core i5-560UM β a 104.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-560UM (base: 2.667 GHz vs 1.33 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the Penryn (2008β2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-560UM uses Arrandale (2010β2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8135 scores 1,020 against the Core i5-560UM's 1,015 β a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8135 | Core i5-560UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.67 GHz | 2.13 GHz+218% |
| Base Clock | 2.667 GHz+101% | 1.33 GHz |
| L3 Cache | β | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+1100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008β2011) | Arrandale (2010β2011) |
| PassMark | 1,020 | 1,015 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-560UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8135 | Core i5-560UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | 800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 8 |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | No |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8135) / true (Core i5-560UM). The Core i5-560UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Core 2 Duo E8135 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-560UM rivals Core 2 Duo SU9400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8135 | Core i5-560UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8135 was priced at $200, while the Core i5-560UM came in at $250. On launch pricing ($200 vs $250), Core 2 Duo E8135 was $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8135 delivers 5.1 pts/$ vs 4.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-560UM β making the Core 2 Duo E8135 the 22.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8135 | Core i5-560UM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-20% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.1+24% | 4.1 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














