Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Pentium J2850

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8135

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.67 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium J2850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Pentium J2850 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Pentium J2850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Pentium J2850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E8135

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).
  • 2100% higher power demand at 44W vs 2W.

Pentium J2850

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $106 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Delivers 111.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.8 vs 5.1 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • Draws 2W instead of 44W, a 42W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo E8135 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,016 vs 1,020).

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E8135 better than Pentium J2850?
Yes. Core 2 Duo E8135 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E8135 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E8135 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 2 Duo E8135 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core 2 Duo E8135 comes in 112.8% more expensive on MSRP at $200 MSRP versus $94 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium J2850 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 5.5% in the shared gaming data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium J2850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo E8135 vs Pentium J2850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8135

The Core 2 Duo E8135 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.667 GHz, with boost up to 0.67 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Pentium J2850

The Pentium J2850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,016 points. Launch price was $94.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E8135 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8135 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium J2850 — a 112.7% clock advantage for the Pentium J2850 (base: 2.667 GHz vs 2.41 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium J2850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8135 scores 1,020 against the Pentium J2850's 1,016 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8135.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Pentium J2850
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
0.67 GHz
2.4 GHz+258%
Base Clock
2.667 GHz+11%
2.41 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,020
1,016
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E8135 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium J2850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Pentium J2850
Socket
P
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8135 was priced at $200, while the Pentium J2850 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($200 vs $94), Pentium J2850 was $106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8135 delivers 5.1 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Pentium J2850 — making the Pentium J2850 the 71.8% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Duo E8135Pentium J2850
MSRP
$200
$94-53%
Performance per Dollar
5.1
10.8+112%
Release Date
2009
2013

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.