
Core 2 Duo E8335

Core i3-350M
Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Core i3-350M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Core i3-350M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Core i3-350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo E8335
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ❌25.7% higher power demand at 44W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i3-350M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 53.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 5.5 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 44W, a 9W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Core 2 Duo E8335 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,088 vs 1,094).
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo E8335 better than Core i3-350M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo E8335 vs Core i3-350M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8335
The Core 2 Duo E8335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.933 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,094 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-350M
The Core i3-350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,088 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo E8335 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-350M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.93 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8335 versus 0.27 GHz on the Core i3-350M — a 110% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8335 (base: 2.933 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-350M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8335 scores 1,094 against the Core i3-350M's 1,088 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8335.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 0.93 GHz+244% | 0.27 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.933 GHz+30% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 256K (per core)+4167% |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,094 | 1,088 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 280 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo E8335 uses the P socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | P | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo E8335) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-350M). The Core i3-350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E8335 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-350M targets Entry Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-350M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Entry Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 2 Duo E8335 was priced at $200, while the Core i3-350M came in at $130. On launch pricing ($200 vs $130), Core i3-350M was $70 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E8335 delivers 5.5 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-350M — making the Core i3-350M the 41.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E8335 | Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $130-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 8.4+53% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














