Core 2 Duo E8435 vs E2-1800

Core 2 Duo E8435 vs E2-1800 Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Duo E8435

2 / 2

1,104

0.0%

1,110

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E8435 vs E2-1800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E8435 vs E2-1800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E8435

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,104 vs 1,110).
❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while E2-1800 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌144.4% higher power demand at 44W vs 18W.

E2-1800

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 44W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-1800 better than Core 2 Duo E8435?

Yes. E2-1800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-1800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-1800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-1800 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-1800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo E8435 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on P.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-1800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E8435 vs E2-1800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E8435

The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.

E2-1800

The E2-1800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,110 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo E8435 and E2-1800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 versus 1.7 GHz on the E2-1800 — a 184.2% clock advantage for the E2-1800. The Core 2 Duo E8435 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-1800 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E8435 scores 1,104 against the E2-1800's 1,110 — a 0.5% lead for the E2-1800.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E8435	E2-1800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.07 GHz	1.7 GHz+2329%
Base Clock	3.067 GHz	—
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)	512K (per core)+8433%
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,104	1,110
Geekbench 6 Single	257	—