
Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E8435

Celeron N3350

Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N3350 is positioned at rank 1068 and the Core 2 Duo E8435 is on rank 1152, so the Celeron N3350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3350
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($74) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+44%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) | ✅ More affordable ($74) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E8435

Celeron N3350
The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Core 2 Duo E8435
The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E8435 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — a 188.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.067 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Core 2 Duo E8435's 1,104 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 257, a 2.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8435 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+3329% | 0.07 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.067 GHz+179% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 6 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,112 | 1,104 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 250 | 257+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — the Celeron N3350 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3350) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E8435) — the Celeron N3350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3350) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435).
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1296 | P |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR4-2400+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 6 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 500 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Entry Level Laptop/NUC | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron N3350 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8435 debuted at $150.
| Feature | Celeron N3350 | Core 2 Duo E8435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $107-29% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $74 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











