Celeron N3350
VS
Core 2 Duo E8435

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E8435

Intel

Celeron N3350

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8435

2 Cores2 Thrd44 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N3350 is positioned at rank 1068 and the Core 2 Duo E8435 is on rank 1152, so the Celeron N3350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N3350

#1056
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2824%
#1057
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2782%
#1058
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2554%
#1059
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2543%
#1060
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2520%
#1062
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2433%
#1063
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2333%
#1064
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2329%
#1065
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2267%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
100%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1075
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1081
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8435

#1140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3986%
#1141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3928%
#1142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3606%
#1143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3590%
#1144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3557%
#1146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3435%
#1147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3293%
#1148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3288%
#1149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3200%
#1152
Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP: $150|Avg: $74
100%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1154
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1155
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
98%
#1158
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
97%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1163
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
95%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
93%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
92%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
92%
#1167
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N3350 (2016) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
More affordable ($74)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E8435 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+44%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($107)
More affordable ($74)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E8435

Intel

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8435

The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E8435 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — a 188.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.067 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Core 2 Duo E8435's 1,104 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 257, a 2.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8435 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+3329%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.067 GHz+179%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB
6 MB (total)+500%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,112
1,104
Geekbench 6 Single
250
257+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — the Celeron N3350 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3350) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E8435) — the Celeron N3350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3350) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435).

FeatureCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
Socket
FCBGA1296
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-2400+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeatureCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Entry Level Laptop/NUC
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron N3350 launched at $107 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8435 debuted at $150.

FeatureCeleron N3350Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP
$107-29%
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$74
Release Date
2016
2009