PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E8435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E8435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $43 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 41.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 7.4 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 6W instead of 44W, a 38W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 257).

Core 2 Duo E8435

2009

Why buy it

✅+2.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,104 vs 1,112).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.4 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
❌633.3% higher power demand at 44W vs 6W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N3350 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N3350 better than Core 2 Duo E8435?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E8435 is ahead with 2.8% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N3350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N3350 is the better buy right now. Celeron N3350 comes in $43 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E8435 is still the better pure gaming CPU with 2.8% stronger Geekbench single-core performance. It is also 41.2% better value on MSRP (10.4 vs 7.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N3350 vs Core 2 Duo E8435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Core 2 Duo E8435

The Core 2 Duo E8435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.067 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 44 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,104 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N3350 and Core 2 Duo E8435 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 versus 0.07 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — a 188.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N3350 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.067 GHz). The Celeron N3350 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N3350 scores 1,112 against the Core 2 Duo E8435's 1,104 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron N3350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 257, a 2.8% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8435 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E8435
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+3329%	0.07 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.067 GHz+179%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	6 MB (total)+500%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,112	1,104
Geekbench 6 Single	250	257+3%
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N3350 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8435 — the Celeron N3350 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8435 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron N3350) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo E8435) — the Celeron N3350 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N3350) and Socket P (Core 2 Duo E8435).

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E8435
Socket	FCBGA1296	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4-2400+80%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core 2 Duo E8435). The Celeron N3350 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Core 2 Duo E8435 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E8435
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 500	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Entry Level Laptop/NUC	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron N3350 was priced at $107, while the Core 2 Duo E8435 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($107 vs $150), Celeron N3350 was $43 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron N3350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 7.4 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8435 — making the Celeron N3350 the 34.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron N3350	Core 2 Duo E8435
MSRP	$107-29%	$150
Performance per Dollar	10.4+41%	7.4
Release Date	2016	2009

Search Celeron N3350 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E8435 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.