Core 2 Duo L7200 vs Core 2 Duo T5200

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo L7200 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo L7200 vs Core 2 Duo T5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo L7200

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 2 Duo T5200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (685 vs 705).
❌750% higher power demand at 17W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5200

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 17W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T5200 better than Core 2 Duo L7200?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T5200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T5200 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T5200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core 2 Duo L7200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo L7200 vs Core 2 Duo T5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo L7200

The Core 2 Duo L7200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It has 2 cores. Base frequency: 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $249.

Core 2 Duo T5200

The Core 2 Duo T5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 705 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo L7200 and Core 2 Duo T5200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Core 2 Duo T5200 is built on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo L7200 scores 685 against the Core 2 Duo T5200's 705 — a 2.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo T5200. L3 cache: 4 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo L7200 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T5200.

Feature	Core 2 Duo L7200	Core 2 Duo T5200
Cores / Threads	2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.66 GHz
Base Clock	1.33 GHz	1.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	4 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	—	2 MB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	—	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	685	705+3%