
Core 2 Duo P9700

Pentium E6500
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium E6500 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium E6500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium E6500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo P9700
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium E6500
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,178).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P9700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo P9700 better than Pentium E6500?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium E6500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P9700
The Core 2 Duo P9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,178 points. Launch price was $348.

Pentium E6500
The Pentium E6500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 0.93 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo P9700 and Pentium E6500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9700 versus 0.93 GHz on the Pentium E6500 — a 100.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P9700 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core 2 Duo P9700 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium E6500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P9700 scores 1,178 against the Pentium E6500's 1,175 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P9700. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9700 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6500.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9700 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+201% | 0.93 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.93 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total)+200% | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,178 | 1,175 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo P9700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium E6500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9700 | Pentium E6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













