Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Intel

Core 2 Duo P9700

2 Cores2 Thrd28 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo P9700

2009

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 512W, a 484W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 X2 TL-50 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,178 vs 1,184).

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2006

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • 1728.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-50 better than Core 2 Duo P9700?
Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Turion 64 X2 TL-50 still makes the most sense overall. Turion 64 X2 TL-50 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P9700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P9700

The Core 2 Duo P9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,178 points. Launch price was $348.

AMD

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9700 versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P9700. The Core 2 Duo P9700 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P9700 scores 1,178 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-50.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P9700Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+75%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+1100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Taylor (2006)
PassMark
1,178
1,184
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo P9700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo P9700Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Socket
PGA478
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%