
Core 2 Duo P9700

Pentium T4400
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium T4400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo P9700
2009Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Pentium T4400
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,178).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo P9700 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 2 Duo P9700 better than Pentium T4400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo P9700
The Core 2 Duo P9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,178 points. Launch price was $348.

Pentium T4400
The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo P9700 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo P9700 scores 1,178 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo P9700. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9700 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4400.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9700 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache+500% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB (total) | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | — |
| PassMark | 1,178 | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 249 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9700 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 2 Duo P9700) / None (Pentium T4400). Primary use case: Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo P9700 | Pentium T4400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













