Core 2 Duo SP9300 vs Celeron 7305
Core 2 Duo SP9300
Celeron 7305
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is positioned at rank 535 and the Celeron 7305 is on rank 890, so the Core 2 Duo SP9300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo SP9300
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 7305
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-U (2022) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($107) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron 7305
Core 2 Duo SP9300
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 August 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,517 points. Launch price was $284.
Celeron 7305
The Celeron 7305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-U (2022) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Max frequency: 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 2,520 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron 7305 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Celeron 7305 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 7305 — a 69% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo SP9300. The Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 7305 uses Alder Lake-U (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo SP9300 scores 2,517 against the Celeron 7305's 2,520 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 7305. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 vs 8 MB (total) on the Celeron 7305.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 5 / 5+150% |
| Boost Clock | 2.26 GHz+105% | 1.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.26 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | Intel 7 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| PassMark | 2,517 | 2,520 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,422 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 641 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,598 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo SP9300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 7305 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core 2 Duo SP9300 versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron 7305 — the Celeron 7305 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 7305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Duo SP9300) vs 20 (Celeron 7305) — the Celeron 7305 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Core 2 Duo SP9300) and Alder Lake-U (Celeron 7305).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | FCBGA1744 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 5.0+355% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR5-4800+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo SP9300) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 7305). The Celeron 7305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 12th Gen), while the Core 2 Duo SP9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 7305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 7305 rivals Ryzen 3 7320U.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo SP9300 | Celeron 7305 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics for 12th Gen |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo SP9300 and Celeron 7305
