CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo T7100
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7100 is positioned at rank 24 and the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is on rank 1077, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+33%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7100 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7100 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Core 2 Duo T7100 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7100 scores 1,817 against the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 1,825 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz+72% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K |
| Process | 65 nm-28% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,817 | 1,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7100 launched at $197 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ debuted at $450. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo T7100 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7100 delivers 121.1 pts/$ vs 91.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — making the Core 2 Duo T7100 the 28.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $197-56% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.1+33% | 91.3 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7100 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
