CPU
GPU
Core 2 Duo T7100
Atom N2800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7100 is positioned at rank 24 and the Atom N2800 is on rank 147, so the Core 2 Duo T7100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7100
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($3) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+403%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) | ✅ More affordable ($3) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7100 and Atom N2800
Core 2 Duo T7100
The Core 2 Duo T7100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,817 points. Launch price was $197.
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom N2800's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7100 versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Atom N2800 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7100 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7100 scores 1,817 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom N2800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 1.87 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 1.86 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 1,817 | 1,829 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7100 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7100 versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 — the Atom N2800 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core 2 Duo T7100) vs 1 (Atom N2800). Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7100) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7100) / not specified (Atom N2800). The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Core 2 Duo T7100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7100 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7100 rivals Athlon 64 X2 TK-42.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3650 |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7100 launched at $197 MSRP, while the Atom N2800 debuted at $47. At current prices ($15 vs $3), the Atom N2800 is $12 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7100 delivers 121.1 pts/$ vs 609.7 pts/$ for the Atom N2800 — making the Atom N2800 the 133.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7100 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $197 | $47-76% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $3-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.1 | 609.7+403% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7100 and Atom N2800
