
Core 2 Duo T7400

Core i5-10400F
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 2 Duo T7400
2006Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 65W, a 61W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (550 vs 5,783).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +286.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core 2 Duo T7400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $160 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T7400 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1525% higher power demand at 65W vs 4W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Core 2 Duo T7400?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 2 Duo T7400 vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo T7400
The Core 2 Duo T7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,861 points. Launch price was $286.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7400 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 66.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.16 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7400 scores 1,861 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 150% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 310 vs 1,454, a 129.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 5,783 (165.3% advantage for the Core i5-10400F). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7400 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.16 GHz | 4.3 GHz+99% |
| Base Clock | 2.16 GHz | 2.9 GHz+34% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core)+6300% |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 1,861 | 13,029+600% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 310 | 1,454+369% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | 5,783+951% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7400 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7400 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 299.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 945GT,GME965 (Core 2 Duo T7400) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR4-2666+300% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7400) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7400 targets Legacy Laptop, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7400 | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













