Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Athlon II X4 641
Core 2 Duo T7500
Athlon II X4 641
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7500 is positioned at rank 88 and the Athlon II X4 641 is on rank 733, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 641
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1936%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7500 and Athlon II X4 641
Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.
Athlon II X4 641
The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 641 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 641 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 641 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Athlon II X4 641 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7500 scores 2,308 against the Athlon II X4 641's 2,313 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 641. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 32 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 2,308 | 2,313 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 507 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon II X4 641 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 641 — the Athlon II X4 641 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 641).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FM1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-1866+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500) / not specified (Athlon II X4 641). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7500 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 641 debuted at $102. At current prices ($5 vs $102), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $97 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7500 delivers 461.6 pts/$ vs 22.7 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 641 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 181.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Athlon II X4 641 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $102-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-95% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 461.6+1933% | 22.7 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Athlon II X4 641
