Core 2 Duo T7500 vs Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T7500
Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7500 is positioned at rank 88 and the Core 2 Duo T8100 is on rank 38, so the Core 2 Duo T8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+99%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core 2 Duo T8100
Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.
Core 2 Duo T8100
The Core 2 Duo T8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core 2 Duo T8100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8100 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T7500 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7500 scores 2,308 against the Core 2 Duo T8100's 2,320 — a 0.5% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100. Multi-core Geekbench: 507 vs 700 (32% advantage for the Core 2 Duo T8100). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8100.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,308 | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 380 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 507 | 700+38% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the PGA478 socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T8100).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget, Core 2 Duo T8100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Core 2 Duo T8100 rivals Core 2 Duo T7250.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7500 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T8100 debuted at $209. At current prices ($5 vs $10), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7500 delivers 461.6 pts/$ vs 232.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T8100 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 66.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $209-34% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-50% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 461.6+99% | 232.0 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core 2 Duo T8100
