
Core 2 Duo T7500

Core m5-6Y54
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7500 is positioned at rank 88 and the Core m5-6Y54 is on rank 1132, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Per Dollar Core m5-6Y54
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+5554%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($5) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7500 and Core m5-6Y54

Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.

Core m5-6Y54
The Core m5-6Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,294 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The Core 2 Duo T7500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m5-6Y54's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core m5-6Y54 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core m5-6Y54 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7500 scores 2,308 against the Core m5-6Y54's 2,294 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7500. Multi-core Geekbench: 507 vs 1,648 (105.9% advantage for the Core m5-6Y54). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7500 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m5-6Y54.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+100% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+1500% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 65 nm | 14 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Merom (2006−2008) | Skylake-Y (2015) |
| PassMark | 2,308 | 2,294 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 875 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 507 | 1,648+225% |
Memory & Platform
The Core 2 Duo T7500 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core m5-6Y54 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core m5-6Y54 — the Core m5-6Y54 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500) and Skylake-Y (Core m5-6Y54).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1515 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | LPDDR3-1866+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 10 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core m5-6Y54). The Core m5-6Y54 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 515), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget, Core m5-6Y54 targets Enthusiast. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U; Core m5-6Y54 rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 515 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Enthusiast |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo T7500 launched at $316 MSRP, while the Core m5-6Y54 debuted at $281. At current prices ($5 vs $281), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $276 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo T7500 delivers 461.6 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core m5-6Y54 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 193% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo T7500 | Core m5-6Y54 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $316 | $281-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-98% | $281 |
| Performance per Dollar | 461.6+5529% | 8.2 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















