Core 2 Duo T7700
VS
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

2 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2007
VS
AMD

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T7700 is positioned at rank 484 and the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is on rank 240, so the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7700

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#472
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
632%
#473
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
623%
#474
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
571%
#475
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
569%
#476
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
564%
#478
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
544%
#479
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
522%
#480
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
521%
#481
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
507%
#484
Core 2 Duo T7700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#488
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
3676%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
3473%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
2522%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
760%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
602%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
526%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
302%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
298%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
271%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
271%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
268%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
261%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
257%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
256%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
254%
#232
Ryzen 3 2200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $80
99%
#233
Core i3-9100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $80
99%
#234
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
MSRP: $479|Avg: $479
98%
#235
Ryzen 9 3900XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $390
98%
#236
Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G
MSRP: $176|Avg: $176
97%
#237
Core i7-14700T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $384
97%
#238
Core i3-13100TE
MSRP: $137|Avg: $137
97%
#239
Core i5-9600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $118
96%
#240
Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#240
Core i5-12400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
95%
#241
Phenom II X4 B97
MSRP: $100|Avg: $11
100%
#241
Core i9-14900F
MSRP: $524|Avg: $579
95%
#251
Phenom II X4 850
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $28
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo T7700 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T7700Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T7700Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T7700 and Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

Intel

Core 2 Duo T7700

The Core 2 Duo T7700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,554 points. Launch price was $307.

AMD

Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)

The Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,544 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo T7700 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7700 versus 3.4 GHz on the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the Merom (2006−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T7700 scores 2,554 against the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)'s 2,544 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo T7700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T7700 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W).

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
0 kB
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4 MB+700%
512 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
45 nm-31%
Architecture
Merom (2006−2008)
Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,554
2,544
Geekbench 6 Single
254
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T7700 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W) uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Socket
PGA478
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7700) / not specified (Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7700 rivals Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T7700Phenom II X4 965 BE (125W)
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget