Core 2 Duo T9300
VS
E1-1200

Core 2 Duo T9300 vs E1-1200

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
VS
AMD

E1-1200

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo T9300 is positioned at rank 176 and the E1-1200 is on rank 644, so the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9300

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
99%
#164
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
351%
#165
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
346%
#166
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
318%
#167
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
316%
#168
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
314%
#170
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
303%
#171
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
290%
#172
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
290%
#173
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
282%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar E1-1200

#632
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
872%
#633
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
859%
#634
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
789%
#635
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
785%
#636
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
778%
#638
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
751%
#639
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
721%
#640
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
719%
#641
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
700%
#644
E1-1200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo T9300 leads in gaming performance. However, the E1-1200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore 2 Duo T9300E1-1200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore 2 Duo T9300E1-1200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo T9300 and E1-1200

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $316.

AMD

E1-1200

The E1-1200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,682 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Duo T9300 and E1-1200 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9300 versus 1.4 GHz on the E1-1200 — a 56.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9300. The Core 2 Duo T9300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E1-1200 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo T9300 scores 1,670 against the E1-1200's 1,682 — a 0.7% lead for the E1-1200. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9300 vs 0 kB on the E1-1200.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9300E1-1200
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+79%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
6 MB+1100%
512K (per core)
Process
45 nm
40 nm-11%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,670
1,682
Geekbench 6 Multi
432
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo T9300 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E1-1200 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9300E1-1200
Socket
PGA478
FT1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9300) / not specified (E1-1200). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T9300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T9300 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCore 2 Duo T9300E1-1200
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget