A6-6310
VS
Core 2 Duo T9300

A6-6310 vs Core 2 Duo T9300

AMD

A6-6310

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-6310 is positioned at rank 735 and the Core 2 Duo T9300 is on rank 176, so the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-6310

#723
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1050%
#724
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1035%
#725
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
950%
#726
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
946%
#727
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
937%
#729
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
905%
#730
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
868%
#731
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
866%
#732
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
843%
#735
A6-6310
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#745
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
98%
#749
Ryzen 3 7320C
MSRP: $299|Avg: $200
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9300

#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
99%
#164
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
351%
#165
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
346%
#166
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
318%
#167
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
316%
#168
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
314%
#170
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
303%
#171
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
290%
#172
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
290%
#173
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
282%
#176
Core 2 Duo T9300
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-6310 (2014) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-1865, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-6310Core 2 Duo T9300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo T9300 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-6310Core 2 Duo T9300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-6310 and Core 2 Duo T9300

AMD

A6-6310

The A6-6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1865. Passmark benchmark score: 1,676 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9300

The Core 2 Duo T9300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,670 points. Launch price was $316.

Processing Power

The A6-6310 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-6310 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-6310 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9300 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9300 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A6-6310 uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-6310 scores 1,676 against the Core 2 Duo T9300's 1,670 — a 0.4% lead for the A6-6310.

FeatureA6-6310Core 2 Duo T9300
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
6 MB+200%
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,676
1,670
Geekbench 6 Single
220
Geekbench 6 Multi
432
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-6310 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1866 memory speed. Memory channels: 1 (A6-6310) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo T9300).

FeatureA6-6310Core 2 Duo T9300
Socket
FT3
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1866
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-6310) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T9300). The A6-6310 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R4), while the Core 2 Duo T9300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-6310 targets Entry Laptop, Core 2 Duo T9300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-6310 rivals Pentium N3530; Core 2 Duo T9300 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureA6-6310Core 2 Duo T9300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R4
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Entry Laptop
Budget