Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 186W instead of 300W, a 114W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌61.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 186W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 200.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 190.5% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 42), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 4nm process instead of 40nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6310 scores 122 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 190.5%. The Radeon HD 6310 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score	122+190%	42
Architecture	TeraScale 3	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1280	4096+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+2392%
ROPs	32	128+300%
TMUs	80	256+220%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	8 MB+1500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6310 draws 186W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 46.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6310) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP	186W-38%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Legacy
Length	—	175mm
Height	—	100mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	0.7+600%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6310 came in at $50, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) vs Infinity (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP	$50	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	2.4	Infinity
Codename	Cayman	Navi 48
Release	December 1 2011	July 23 2025
Ranking	#598	#23

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.