Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 110M

2013

Why buy it

✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 45W instead of 300W, a 255W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

2025

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (42 vs 48).
❌566.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 110M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 14.3% in PassMark G3D (48 vs 42), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 64 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro NVS 110M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro NVS 110M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro NVS 110M vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the Quadro NVS 110M leads by 14.3%. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
G3D Mark Score	48+14%	42
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	4096+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	47.84 TFLOPS+8723%
ROPs	16	128+700%
TMUs	32	256+700%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 147.8% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
TDP	45W-85%	300W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	—	175mm
Height	—	100mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	1.1+1000%	0.1

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK107	Navi 48
Release	July 23 2013	July 23 2025
Ranking	#856	#23

Search Quadro NVS 110M on Amazon

Search RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.