Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 110M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1050

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro NVS 110M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 55W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon X1050

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 22.2% higher power demand at 55W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 48), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

AMD

Radeon X1050

The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 and the Radeon X1050 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).

FeatureQuadro NVS 110MRadeon X1050
G3D Mark Score
48
49+2%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5422 TFLOPS
11.47 TFLOPS+2015%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro NVS 110MRadeon X1050
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 110M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 carries 256 MB. Quadro NVS 110M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M and 64-bit on the Radeon X1050. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro NVS 110MRadeon X1050
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
8 MB+3100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 20% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro NVS 110MRadeon X1050
TDP
45W-18%
55W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
165mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.1+22%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1050 (2025 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro NVS 110MRadeon X1050
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK107
Strix Halo
Release
July 23 2013
January 6 2025
Ranking
#856
#126

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.