Quadro NVS 110M vs Radeon X1050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro NVS 110M is positioned at rank #221 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro NVS 110M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

92%

#96

L4

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

90%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

87%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

87%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

85%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

79%

#206

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3078%

#221

Quadro NVS 110M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#223

FirePro W7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $50

100%

#224

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700

MSRP: $169|Avg: $100

99%

#226

FirePro D500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#227

FirePro 3D V4800

MSRP: $189|Avg: $20

94%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1050 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2013). The Radeon X1050 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro NVS 110M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro NVS 110M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1050
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1050 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro NVS 110M Benchmark Check

Radeon X1050 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro NVS 110M and Radeon X1050

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

Radeon X1050

The Radeon X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro NVS 110M scores 48 and the Radeon X1050 reaches 49 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro NVS 110M is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1050 uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1050). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon X1050).

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1050
G3D Mark Score	48	49+2%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	11.47 TFLOPS+2015%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1050
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro NVS 110M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1050 has 256 MB. The Quadro NVS 110M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 8 MB (Radeon X1050) — the Radeon X1050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro NVS 110M	Radeon X1050
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	8 MB+3100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro NVS 110M draws 45W versus the Radeon X1050's 55W — a 20% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro NVS 110M) vs 350W (Radeon X1050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.