MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Quadro NVS 110M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Quadro NVS 110M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Quadro NVS 110M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro NVS 110M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 110M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.3% in PassMark G3D (48 vs 46), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro NVS 110M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Quadro NVS 110M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

Quadro NVS 110M

The Quadro NVS 110M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 48 points. Launch price was $109.94.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 and the Quadro NVS 110M reaches 48 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro NVS 110M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 384 (Quadro NVS 110M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 110M).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro NVS 110M
G3D Mark Score	46	48+4%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	800+108%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+107%	0.5422 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	80 KB+150%	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro NVS 110M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 110M carries 512 MB. Quadro NVS 110M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 110M.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro NVS 110M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the Quadro NVS 110M's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The Quadro NVS 110M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 110M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro NVS 110M
TDP	50W	45W-10%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	0.9	1.1+22%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro NVS 110M (2013 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro NVS 110M
MSRP	$229	—
Codename	Broadway	GK107
Release	January 7 2010	July 23 2013
Ranking	#846	#856

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Search Quadro NVS 110M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.