MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs RADEON X600 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs RADEON X600 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs RADEON X600 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 132W, a 82W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
129% HIGHER MSRP
$229 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

RADEON X600 SE

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Delivers 143.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌164% higher power demand at 132W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON X600 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.5% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 46), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON X600 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON X600 SE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 143.9% (0.5 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs RADEON X600 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

RADEON X600 SE

The RADEON X600 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 8 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 versus the RADEON X600 SE's 49 — the RADEON X600 SE leads by 6.5%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON X600 SE uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 1,792 (RADEON X600 SE). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 8.942 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 SE).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	RADEON X600 SE
G3D Mark Score	46	49+7%
Architecture	TeraScale 2	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	800	1792+124%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS	8.942 TFLOPS+698%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	112+180%
L1 Cache	80 KB	512 KB+540%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	RADEON X600 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON X600 SE carries 512 MB. RADEON X600 SE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and 64-bit on the RADEON X600 SE. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 2 MB (RADEON X600 SE) — the RADEON X600 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	RADEON X600 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the RADEON X600 SE's 132W — a 90.1% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (RADEON X600 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	RADEON X600 SE
TDP	50W-62%	132W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	0.9+125%	0.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 came in at $229, while the RADEON X600 SE launched at $100. On MSRP, RADEON X600 SE was 56.3% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 0.5 (RADEON X600 SE) — the RADEON X600 SE offers 150% better value. The newer card here is RADEON X600 SE (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	RADEON X600 SE
MSRP	$229	$100-56%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	0.5+150%
Codename	Broadway	Navi 23
Release	January 7 2010	December 8 2023
Ranking	#846	#176

Search MOBILITY RADEON 9800 on Amazon

Search RADEON X600 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.