MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Quadro FX 350M

CPU

GPU

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010Core: 700 MHz

Quadro FX 350M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

+2.2%

MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP

MOBILITY RADEON 9550

MOBILITY RADEON X300

Mobility Radeon X1350

Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank 737 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800

#726

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

54285%

#728

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

49210%

#729

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

49080%

#733

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

44630%

#734

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

44325%

#736

RADEON 9500

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

100%

#737

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

MSRP: $229|Avg: $25

100%

#738

RADEON X850 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $50

80%

#739

RADEON 9800

MSRP: $399|Avg: $399

75%

#741

RADEON 9000

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

50%

#742

RADEON 9200 SE

MSRP: $30|Avg: $15

50%

#743

MOBILITY RADEON 7500

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

40%

#744

MOBILITY RADEON 9200

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

30%

#745

MOBILITY RADEON 9000

MSRP: $50|Avg: $5

30%

#746

GeForce4 MX 420

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

25%

#747

RADEON 9250

MSRP: $79|Avg: $25

20%

#748

RADEON 9200

MSRP: $99|Avg: $25

20%

#749

GeForce 256

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

15%

#750

GeForce4 MX 440

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

15%

#751

GeForce2 MX/MX 400

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

15%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M

#94

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799

98%

#96

MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800

96%

#97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500

93%

#98

RTX 5880 Ada Generation

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000

93%

#99

Tesla M40

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099

91%

#100

Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499

84%

#101

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Edition

MSRP: $11605|Avg: $8199

81%

#213

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

3283%

#228

Quadro FX 350M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#231

GRID T4-2Q

MSRP: $845|Avg: $600

96%

#238

FirePro 3D V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

81%

#240

Quadro K600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

81%

#241

FirePro S7000

MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40

80%

#242

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400

80%

#243

FirePro V7000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $100

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 350M.

Insight	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 350M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and Quadro FX 350M

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 and the Quadro FX 350M reaches 45 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	46+2%	45
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	800+233%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.12 TFLOPS+80%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9.0b	9.0c
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	2.1	2.1
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs None (Quadro FX 350M). Decoder: VideoShader HD vs PureVideo HD (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	MOBILITY RADEON 9800	Quadro FX 350M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	VideoShader HD	PureVideo HD (VP1)
Codecs	MPEG-2,MPEG-4	MPEG-2,WMV9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.