MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon X1600

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600

2020Boost: 2105 MHz
Similar parts
·······

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon X1600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 50W instead of 255W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 15.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $229 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $30 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • Delivers 22.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 410% higher power demand at 255W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.5% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 46), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $229, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 22.6% (0.2 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

MOBILITY RADEON 9800 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

AMD

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 scores 46 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 6.5%. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score
46
49+7%
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
800
4608+476%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.12 TFLOPS
19.4 TFLOPS+1632%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
288+620%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
DirectX
9.0b
9_0c
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs Avivo (Radeon X1600). Decoder: VideoShader HD vs Avivo.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
Encoder
None
Avivo
Decoder
VideoShader HD
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 draws 50W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 134.4% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
TDP
50W-80%
255W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.9+350%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 came in at $229, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon X1600 was 13.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the Radeon X1600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2010).

FeatureMOBILITY RADEON 9800Radeon X1600
MSRP
$229
$199-13%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
0.2
Codename
Broadway
Navi 21
Release
January 7 2010
October 28 2020
Ranking
#846
#34

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.