GeForce FX Go5700 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9800
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX Go5700 is positioned at rank 296 and the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is on rank 737, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX Go5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9800.
| Insight | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX Go5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX Go5700 and MOBILITY RADEON 9800
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX Go5700 scores 51 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 46 — the GeForce FX Go5700 leads by 10.9%. The GeForce FX Go5700 is built on Rankine while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 51+11% | 46 |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX Go5700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB. The GeForce FX Go5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 256 KB (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) — the GeForce FX Go5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VPE 3.0 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Decoder: VPE 3.0 vs VideoShader HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX Go5700) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VPE 3.0 | None |
| Decoder | VPE 3.0 | VideoShader HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX Go5700 draws 219W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX Go5700) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce FX Go5700 | MOBILITY RADEON 9800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.9+350% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX Go5700 and MOBILITY RADEON 9800
