FirePro 2450
VS
MOBILITY RADEON 9800

FirePro 2450 vs MOBILITY RADEON 9800

FirePro 2450

2013Core: 715 MHz
VS
AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON 9800

#726
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
54285%
#728
49210%
#729
49080%
#733
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
44630%
#734
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
44325%
#736
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
100%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
100%
#738
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
80%
#739
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
75%
#741
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
50%
#742
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
50%
#743
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
30%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
30%
#746
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
25%
#747
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
20%
#748
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
20%
#749
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
15%
#750
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
15%
#751
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
15%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 2450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON 9800.

InsightFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+10.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-10.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro 2450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro 2450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $25), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 177.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+177.2%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($25)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 2450 and MOBILITY RADEON 9800

AMD

FirePro 2450

The FirePro 2450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

AMD

MOBILITY RADEON 9800

The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 46 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 2450 scores 51 versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 46 — the FirePro 2450 leads by 10.9%. The FirePro 2450 is built on GCN 1.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro 2450) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro 2450) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
G3D Mark Score
51+11%
46
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5491 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+104%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
40+67%
L1 Cache
96 KB+20%
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 2450 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 has 256 MB. The FirePro 2450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB+100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 9.0b (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
DirectX
10.1+12%
9.0b
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD (FirePro 2450) vs None (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Decoder: UVD vs VideoShader HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2450) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800).

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
Encoder
UVD
None
Decoder
UVD
VideoShader HD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 2450 draws 150W versus the MOBILITY RADEON 9800's 50W — a 100% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 2450) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON 9800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 170mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
170mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
60°C-20%
75
Perf/Watt
0.3
0.9+200%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 2450 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the MOBILITY RADEON 9800 launched at $229 and now averages $25. The FirePro 2450 costs 60% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.1 (FirePro 2450) vs 1.8 (MOBILITY RADEON 9800) — the FirePro 2450 offers 183.3% better value. The FirePro 2450 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 2450MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP
$0-100%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$10-60%
$25
Performance per Dollar
5.1+183%
1.8
Codename
Opal
Broadway
Release
October 16 2013
January 7 2010
Ranking
#879
#846